HANDLER said:
In theory, given its design, if values were taken in actual driving conditions instead of on the dyno, I feel you might see a more significant increase in HP over the moded stock box. The Hypercharger tries to simulate the design characteristics of a ram air system on a car. If the vehicle is moving at a high rate of speed and thus air pressure is present on the intake of the Hypercharger, you are essentialy forcing air into the engine as apposed to a passive use of air based upon cyclinder vacume being produced. This is all in theory mind you. I am not sure the Hypercharge does much but it for sure doesn't do any less than any other type of intake and looks better than most in my opinion. Mike
What you're not taking into account is a couple of things here that are a portion of what I base my opinions on. The hyper has a big ass drain slit in the bottom, so any "ram air" affect it might get from riding is lost right out the bottom of the box.
Also - forcing air into an airbox is NOT always a good thing. Depending on the design of the box it can create a "venturi effect" and actually take some air from the engine by creating a vacuum. If you don't believe this ask some folks who have run certain versions of the modified stock box - if you modify the box the "wrong way" (which is kind of a crapshoot) then you could end up hurting more than helping the engine. This happened with Lee in the past - he posted about it when it happened.
I'm not trying to steer anyone away from a charger if they want one, I said above - buy what you want - I'm just trying to make a statement based on some experience and knowledge. When it all comes down to it, it's not my bike or my decision. :wink: